Starbucks Announces Major Store Closures and Layoffs: What’s Going On?

On September 25, 2025, Starbucks made waves in the business world by unveiling a sweeping restructuring plan that includes significant store closures and layoffs. The move is part of a broader “turnaround” effort under CEO Brian Niccol to reenergize the the company’s operations, restore its core identity, and return to sustained growth.

Below is a deep dive into what is happening, why Starbucks is doing this, and what the implications may be—for employees, customers, competitors, and the industry at large.

Key Facts & Figures

Let’s begin with a snapshot of the main details:

Metric	Estimate / Announcement
Total cost of restructuring	≈ US$1 billion
Layoffs (non‑retail / support / corporate roles)	~ 900 jobs
Store closures	Hundreds of stores (mainly underperforming ones)
Expected net change in North American store count	Shrink by ~1% (i.e. 124 fewer than prior year)
Allocation of cost	~$150 million for severance / separation benefits; ~$850 million tied to lease exits, store shutdowns, asset impairments, and related costs
Timeline	Closure actions begin immediately; most to be completed by end of current fiscal year
Geographic scope	Primarily U.S. and Canada, but some closures in Europe (UK, Austria, Switzerland) as well

One particularly notable closure is Starbucks’ Seattle Reserve Roastery in Capitol Hill—a flagship, high‑profile location near its headquarters—which will shut down under this plan.

Why Is Starbucks Doing This?

1. Flagging Performance & Market Pressure

Starbucks has been under strain in recent years, especially in its U.S. operations. The company has posted six consecutive quarters of declining same‑store sales. Consumer behavior, inflationary pressures, and competition from cheaper coffee alternatives have squeezed margins.

In that context, Starbucks needed to act — to cut costs, refocus resources, and re-center on profitability.

2. “Back to Starbucks” Strategy & Brand Reset

Under CEO Brian Niccol (who joined in late 2024), the company has pushed a plan called “Back to Starbucks”, aiming to recapture the ambiance and core identity of its coffeehouses: warm, inviting, and efficient.

As part of that, Niccol has emphasized:

Reducing menu complexity and streamlining operations
Reducing wait times in stores
Investing in store design upgrades for a more “layered, warm” feel
Reallocating headcount and capital toward in‑store execution, rather than back‑office bloat

Closures are being targeted to stores that “fail to meet the physical environment standards customers expect” or that lack a clear path to financial viability.

3. Cost Discipline & Efficiency

In addition to shutting stores and cutting roles, Starbucks is also eliminating many open / unfilled positions, aiming for a leaner support structure.

This is not the first layoff wave: in earlier 2025, Starbucks cut 1,100 corporate employees worldwide as part of restructuring.

The company views these steps as necessary to reallocate investment toward the stores and front‑line operations that directly impact customer experience and revenue.

Impacts and Reactions

On Employees & Labor

Non‑retail / corporate staff will bear the brunt of the layoffs (≈ 900).
Baristas / store staff in affected locations may be offered transfers to nearby stores where possible; if not, severance packages will be provided.
The union Starbucks Workers United criticized the decision, stating that closures were made without input from frontline workers. The union plans to bargain for impacted employees in unionized stores.
Because many stores being closed were unionized or had union activity (e.g. the Seattle Reserve Roastery had union representation), there is speculation and friction over whether union status influenced decisions. Starbucks repeatedly says unionization was not a factor in selecting which stores to shutter.

On Customers & Brand

For communities that lose a Starbucks location, the convenience and local gathering spot will go away, which may spur backlash or negative sentiment.
However, strengthening other stores (through renovations, improved service, reimagined layouts) may help Starbucks rebuild brand loyalty.
Some customers may view the closures as a retreat or weakening of Starbucks’ footprint; others might welcome a leaner, more focused brand.

On Starbucks’ Financials & Strategy

The $1 billion charge is sizable, but these are largely one‑time costs (lease exits, severance, asset write-downs) intended to pave the way for future savings and returns.
Long term, Starbucks hopes to increase the efficiency and profitability per store, rather than chase purely scale.
The company also plans to redesign over 1,000 stores in the coming year to reflect the new in‑store experience vision.
Starbucks affirmed that after this retrenchment, it will seek future growth again.

Broader Industry Signals

What Starbucks is doing may echo or foreshadow trends in the broader food & beverage / retail sectors:

Major brands are under pressure to optimize footprints and reduce underperforming units.
Margins are being squeezed across many consumer sectors by inflation, rising labor costs, and shifts in consumer spending.
The importance of in‑store experience is becoming critical: environments that feel stale or impersonal are less resilient in a competitive landscape.

Risks & Challenges Ahead

Even though Starbucks’ plan is bold, the company faces several risks as it executes:

Execution risk — closing stores and shifting staff can be logistically complex and disruptive. Poor execution may hurt customer experience or brand trust.
Moral & cultural impact — morale among retained employees may suffer; talent drain or backlash is possible.
Public / community backlash — closures may “leave holes” in certain geographies, and negative press could amplify discontent.
Union & labor conflict — tensions with Starbucks Workers United may escalate, particularly if closures hit unionized stores.
Overreliance on cost cuts — reducing size is easier than rebuilding growth; Starbucks must also drive demand, innovation, and brand strength.
Macro uncertainty — consumer spending, coffee commodity prices, and external shocks (e.g. recession) may hamper recovery.

What to Watch Going Forward

Here are some critical signals to monitor as Starbucks carries out its plan:

Store-level performance — which locations survive, which are redesigned, and how their revenue growth compares to those not touched.
Retention & turnover — how well Starbucks holds onto talent post-layoffs.
Customer metrics — metrics like “same-store sales,” foot traffic, and customer satisfaction before vs after renovations.
Union negotiations & disputes — whether the union escalates legal or labor action in response to the closings.
Stock market & investor reactions — how the market views Starbucks’ long-term prospects post‑restructuring.
Expansion plans — where Starbucks looks to grow next (international markets, new formats, innovation, etc.).

Search This Blog

Oops That Happened